Some images may contain trademarked logos incidentally (or purposely if the image is either freely licensed, covered under freedom of panorama, or being too simple to be copyrightable). Using such images on user pages is allowed. These images are considered self-promotion and the Wikipedia community has repeatedly reached consensus to delete such images. Images with you, friends or family prominently featured in a way that distracts from the image topic are not recommended for the main namespace. If you have questions in respect to this, please ask the regulars at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights. The shape and design of utilitarian objects, such as cars, furniture, and tools, are generally considered uncopyrightable, allowing such photos to be put into the public domain or freely licensed however this does not extend to decorative features such as artistic elements on the object's surfaces like an artistic painting on a car's hood. For three-dimensional art and architecture such as buildings in public spaces, each country has unique freedom of panorama allowances that consider if such photographs are treated as derivative works of the object and thus copyrighted Commons:Freedom of panorama outlines these clauses per jurisdiction. Whether the photo carries the copyright of the object photographed depends on numerous factors. Photographs of three-dimensional objects almost always generate a new copyright, though others may continue to hold copyright in items depicted in such photographs. Photographs of two-dimensional objects such as paintings in a museum often do not create a new copyright (see the section on the public domain below), as, within the United States, these are considered "slavish copies" without any creativity (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Simply re-tracing a copyrighted image or diagram does not necessarily create a new copyright-copyright is generated only by instances of "creativity", and not by the amount of labor which went into the creation of the work. The legal rights for images generally lie with the photographer, not the subject.
Such images can include photographs which you yourself took. When licensing an image, it is common practice to multi-license under both GFDL and a Creative Commons license. All user-created images must be licensed under a free license, such as a Creative Commons license, or released into the public domain, which removes all copyright and licensing restrictions. Wikipedia encourages users to upload their own images.
free of all copyrights ( example, see below for details).
The vast majority of images on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used here – even if there is not a copyright notice, it is automatically copyrighted from the moment of creation. Important note: just because you did not have to pay money for the image does not mean that it is "free content" or acceptable for use on Wikipedia.
COPYRIGHT FREE ANIME IMAGES LICENSE
Note that images that are licensed for use only on Wikipedia, or only for non-commercial or educational use, or under a license that doesn't allow for the creation of modified/derived works, are unsuitable. Freely licensed: You can prove that the copyright holder has released the image under an acceptable free license ( example, see below for details).statue or app) that appear in it ( example, see below for details). In case of a photograph or screenshot, you must also own the copyright for all copyright-protected items (e.g. Own work: You own all rights to the image, usually meaning that you created it entirely yourself.
Before you upload an image, make sure that the image falls in one of the four categories:
0 kommentar(er)
